Comparison · 7 min read

Waterjet vs. laser, plasma & EDM

No process wins at everything, and any honest manufacturer will tell you so. Here is a fair comparison of the four main industrial cutting methods — where each one is the right tool, and where it isn't.

Side by side

The four processes, compared.

 WaterjetLaserPlasmaEDM
MaterialsAlmost anything — stone, glass, ceramic, metal, composites, rubber, foamMostly metals; some plastics, wood; not reflective metals or stone/glassElectrically conductive metals onlyElectrically conductive metals only
Max thicknessVery high — up to ~150 mm (5.9 in) metal, ~100 mm (3.9 in) stoneThin to medium metal (~25 mm / ~1 in practical for most fiber lasers)Medium-thick metal (~50 mm / ~2 in)Limited; slow on thick sections
Edge qualitySmooth, square, often ready to useClean on thin metal; dross & taper as thickness risesRougher, with dross and bevelExcellent, very fine
Heat-affected zoneNone — cold cutting, no HAZYes — melts/burns the edgeYes — significant heatSmall recast layer
Warping riskNonePossible on thin/tall partsHigher on thin materialMinimal
Kerf widthNarrow (~0.8–1.2 mm / 0.03–0.05 in)Very narrow on thin metalWideExtremely fine (wire)
Secondary finishingOften noneOften needed on thick cuts (deburr, dross)Usually neededRarely
SpeedModerate — wins on range, not raw speedFast on thin sheet metalFast on thick metalSlow
Typical useStone, glass & ceramic; thick or mixed-material work; heat-sensitive partsHigh-volume thin sheet-metal productionFast, rough cutting of structural steelPrecision tooling, dies, intricate metal detail

Figures are typical industry ranges and vary by machine, power and material. Waterjet thickness figures reflect Rich machine capability: up to 150 mm (5.9 in) aluminum and 100 mm (3.9 in) stone.

The honest take

When each one is the right call.

Choose waterjet when…

You cut stone, glass, ceramic or mixed materials; you need thick sections; you can't tolerate a heat-affected zone or warping; or you want a square edge with little finishing. Waterjet's advantage is range — one machine, almost any material, almost any thickness, no heat. That breadth is why it anchors a fabrication shop.

Choose laser when…

You run high volumes of thin sheet metal and raw speed is everything. On thin steel a fiber laser is hard to beat for throughput — provided you can accept a heat-affected edge and that you're not cutting reflective metals, stone or glass.

Choose plasma when…

You need to cut thick conductive metal fast and cheaply, and edge quality is a secondary concern. Plasma is quick on structural steel but leaves dross, a wider kerf and heat.

Choose EDM when…

You need extreme precision and fine detail in conductive metal — dies, tooling, intricate profiles — and you can accept that it's slow and limited to metals.

For most shops cutting stone, glass, ceramic or a mix of materials and thicknesses, waterjet is the broadest, lowest-risk choice — and it's the only one of the four that adds zero heat to the part.

Decided waterjet is the fit?

Rich has engineered its own IP68 cutting head and intensifier in-house since 2008. Tell the configurator what you cut and get the right machine — and a real price.